Trump’s political effigy should read ‘Let them eat dog’

OTTAWA—I ate dawg to celebrate the debate-thrashing administered to former president Donald Trump by future president Kamala Harris. My dawg wasn’t real. It was a hot dog confection created by the team at Tavern on the Falls on Sussex Drive in the nation’s capital. Called da dawg, it includes corned beef and sauerkraut atop the large steamy that the restaurant is known for. This dawg choice was perfectly timed because everyone was talking about Trump’s bizarre debate claim that dogs and cats were being eaten by immigrants who should not have been let into the United States. Trump literally screamed that illegal immigrants were eating people’s pets in Ohio. ABC’s debate co-moderator David Muir immediately rebutted the claim saying that Springfield city manager Bryan Heck had already laid waste to that false accusation. That didn’t faze Trump. He said he had even seen the carnivorous behaviour being discussed on television. Trump was referring to a discredited internet claim that Haitian immigrants were kidnapping people’s pets to cook them for dinner. That internet nugget had been peddled by his running mate J.D. Vance who was reported to have clarified the pet-eating rumours might have been false. Trump’s shouts about eating dogs prompted Harris to laugh out loud, which spiked Trump’s temperature even further. Even when the debate's subject matter was supposed to be delving into other issues like economic policy, Trump focused his pitch almost exclusively on Democratic immigration policies that he claims have let millions of criminals into the country. He went on to say that the crime rate around the world is going down because Harris and U.S. President Joe Biden have created border policies that are letting all foreign lawbreakers to move to the United States. He said that was causing a spike in American crime. When Muir pointed out that the American crime rate had gone down, Trump ignored that fact and simply pointed to his own experience, declaring he had taken a bullet in the head because of Harris’ policies. Trump was referring to the assassination attempt on July 13 where his ear was allegedly grazed by a bullet that killed a rally supporter but he was saved because he moved his head at the last minute. His ear appeared fully intact on debate night. Sporting a new haircut, the side of his head was visible. No tear or scarring is visible on the lobe. Trump trumpeted his near-death experience, but didn’t seem too out of sorts until Harris mentioned how many people were leaving his rallies from boredom. The former president kept his lips pursed throughout that line of attack, and went on to waste valuable airtime explaining how his crowds were bigger than hers, and how much he was loved by the people while she was hated, even by President Biden. Harris was deftly able to bait her opponent on a number of issues, but also managed to engage in economic issues in support of small business and housing. She repeated her positive claim that she would be running an “opportunity economy” while in government, expanding the child tax credit, and lowering prices for food and prescription drugs. She also peppered Trump with questions about his inconsistent position on abortion. He recently said he would oppose a Florida referendum banning abortions after six weeks into a pregnancy, and then reversed his position the following day. For her part, Harris agreed to reinstate a national policy to take the abortion decision out of the hands of government and give it back to the women whose bodies are affected. She went on to accuse Trump of currying favour with dictators who could easily seduce him with flattery and favours. Trump helped make her point by telling his audience that he has the support of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban who is known as an autocratic strongman cosying up to the Russians. Trump also dodged questions about whether he supported Ukrainians in their fight for survival following a Russian invasion of their sovereign territory. When asked repeatedly whether he supported Ukraine, the former president simply ignored the question, and repeated that he would have the issue solved before the presidential swearing-in if he were elected president. All the post-debate punditry seemed to say that Trump was badly beaten by a better-prepared, calmer Harris who was more presidential in demeanour. The former president was more into personal attacks than in convincing Americans he was fit to govern. If he is defeated, Trump’s political effigy should read “Let them eat dog.” Sheila Copps is a former Jean Chrétien-era cabinet minister, and a former deputy prime minister. The Hill Times

Trump’s political effigy should read ‘Let them eat dog’

The debate moderator rebutted the pet-eating immigrants claim, but that didn’t faze Trump, who said he’d seen the carnivorous behaviour talked about on TV.

Canada’s aging crisis and a call for reform in eldercare

South Korea to the rescue in Ukraine?

Appeasing Donald Trump with defence dollars

A reluctance for post-pandemic learning

It’s not promises that build the economy—it’s construction

Progress towards partnership: Canada taking strides on African engagement

‘Extreme apprehension’: Canada holds its breath as U.S. election enters final stage

Trump alienates women and Puerto Rican voters

U.S. presidential election may reveal if the clock strikes 13

U.S. election offers Liberals a glimmer of hope

Trump told 30,573 lies during his four years in office, but it just doesn’t matter in today’s low-road politics

News

Get free news updates

Opinion

Submit a guest opinion article

resources

Advertise

subscribe

get help

Get free news updates

Submit a guest opinion article

Trump’s political effigy should read ‘Let them eat dog’

The debate moderator rebutted the pet-eating immigrants claim, but that didn’t faze Trump, who said he’d seen the carnivorous behaviour talked about on TV.

Get The Foreign Policy Newsletter