Why politicians have a hard time retiring

Politics is a disease for which there is no vaccination. How else to explain the reason why politicians have such a hard time retiring? Most people count down the days until they can stop working. But U.S. President Joe Biden is 81 years old, and still refuses to entertain the idea of getting out. Ditto for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Trudeau has accomplished extraordinary things during his decade in power, which have even his enemies damning him with faint praise. Norman Spector recently tweeted that Trudeau had been “the most consequential prime minister in his lifetime." He went on to say Trudeau was even more consequential than his father. That praise was tempered by adding “more decades than I have left will have to pass to know whether the massive changes he’s precipitated are making Canada a better country—or destroying it.” Trudeau put Indigenous issues on the agenda with more investments and legislative change to support reconciliation than any prime minister in history. He also introduced nationally accessible child care, dental care and pharmacare, permanently hiked seniors' pensions, and launched a national school lunch program initiative during the quickest economic recovery in the G8. Quite a record for a decade which included two years of focussed attention on a worldwide once-in-a-century pandemic. So why don’t either of these accomplished men want to exit with their heads held high? To paraphrase former Ontario premier Ernie Eves, the worst day in politics is better than the best day on Bay Street. Outsiders may think it is hubris that keeps politicians going. But they would be wrong. The capacity for societal change lands squarely in the lap of politicians, and they know how much their work can actually be the agent for change. Trudeau understands that his vision will not likely be shared by any successor, whether it be from his own party or the Conservatives. Biden has devoted his life to fighting for the workers, and he wants to continue that work. It is up to those closest to these leaders to guide them in the right direction. In Trudeau’s case, following his separation from Sophie Grégoire last summer, he won’t be getting any pillow-talk counsel. He may be hearing from his children, but their youthful wisdom may not parallel advice from close adults. Biden is obviously getting an earful from his partner Jill Biden, and his adult children. They are pushing him to stay even though his public performances and aging issues have become the dominant theme on the eve of his presidential re-election fight. Donald Trump is chomping at the bit, hoping to bait Biden into another encounter since the first debate was so damaging to the Democrats. Senior Democrats are working on the Biden family to convince them that keeping Joe in the job will end up destroying his legacy, not enhancing it. Senior Liberals are not able to work on family members who can exercise a considerable amount of influence. Instead, they are reaching out to the inner circle of Trudeau’s key advisers. That group seems to believe that the prime minister’s campaign prowess will carry him through the current travails. His chief of staff has been working the back rooms of leadership since she was at Queen’s Park with then-Premier Kathleen Wynne. Katie Telford was there in the 2014 election when Wynne was supposed to lose. Instead, she turned it around and Liberals served one more term in provincial government. Telford’s job also depends on Trudeau staying, so it may be understandable that she sees possible redemption on the campaign trail. But Wynne’s second try in 2018 was a disaster with the leader announcing her own retirement days before the campaign ended. The party ended up losing status with few seats, and the worst defeat in Ontario political history. Telford was not responsible for that debacle, as the campaign was run by David Herle, former adviser to prime minister Paul Martin who led Martin back to the wilderness in 2006. But Telford understands political history. Every leader cares about the direction in which they take their country. But at some point, even consequential leadership loses its lustre. The power of political change is inevitable especially in the post-information age. In Biden’s case, he has admirably served his country for 52 years. He can leave with his head held high. In comparison, Trudeau’s tenure is brief, but he needs to weigh his legacy against the risk of losing it all. Quite a balancing act. Sheila Copps is a former Jean Chrétien-era cabinet minister, and a former deputy prime minister. The Hill Times

Why politicians have a hard time retiring

Trudeau’s tenure is brief but he needs to weigh his legacy against the risk of losing it all. Quite a balancing act.

Canada’s aging crisis and a call for reform in eldercare

As COP29 wraps up, will Canada finally stop funding fossils this fall?

Addressing the threat of antimicrobial resistance

The wisdom of Homer Simpson and Aaron Sorkin

Climate finance should target resilient food systems

Trump’s ‘America First’ plans may undermine global trade

America’s worrying political trend

Tackling humanitarian disaster takes guts, not words

Pollsters as the voice of doom

A week of destruction, carnage, and provocation that lit the Middle East powder keg

Trudeau’s message to potential leadership candidates at Grit policy convention: ‘Cool your jets a little bit,’ say senior Liberals

News

Get free news updates

Opinion

Submit a guest opinion article

resources

Advertise

subscribe

get help

Get free news updates

Submit a guest opinion article

Why politicians have a hard time retiring

Trudeau’s tenure is brief but he needs to weigh his legacy against the risk of losing it all. Quite a balancing act.

Get The Weekend Point of View Newsletter