Israel’s 21st-century version of pogrom

LONDON, U.K.—The dictionary definition of pogrom is “an organized massacre of a particular ethnic group, particularly that of Jewish people in Russia or eastern Europe in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.” So, there is something deeply strange about hearing “pogrom” used in Hebrew to describe what some Jewish people are doing to Arabs in 21st-century Israel. It’s one of those words, like apartheid, that were once seen as evidence of lurking anti-Semitism, but the dwindling fraction of Israeli Jews who still support the state’s original liberal democratic values have begun to use them about the far-right reality they now inhabit. Consider what happened in the Palestinian village of Huwara on Feb. 26. Huwara is in the northern West Bank. Nobody there under the age of 60 can recall a time when they didn’t live under Israeli military rule. People under 40 will remember a time when there were only a few thousand Jewish settlers in the occupied territories, but now there are about 700,000. In one sense, the “cycle of violence” between the Arab population and Jewish settlers stretches back to the Israeli conquest of the West Bank in 1967. In more immediate terms, however, the current sequence of atrocities and counter-atrocities began with a big Israeli raid in the Palestinian city of Nablus last week. The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) were looking for three members of the local “Lion’s Den” resistance movement, but in the end, 11 Palestinians were killed, at least five of whom were innocent civilians. More than 100 were wounded. Huwara, just south of Nablus, lies along Highway 60, the main north-south route in the West Bank, so Israeli settlers frequently drive past. On Feb. 26, a local Palestinian gunman wearing a Lion’s Den T-shirt shot dead two young brothers from a nearby Jewish settlement after crashing into their car. Later that day, a mob of about 400 young Israelis from the surrounding settlements went into Huwara and carried out a proper pogrom: only one Palestinian shot dead, but 100 injured (the settlers were carrying iron bars), hundreds of cars burned, and at least 100 houses smashed up and some set on fire. The IDF was present, but did nothing. Just another week in the occupied territories. The next intifada (Palestinian uprising) waits around the corner, and beyond that, probably the next war between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Hezbollah in southern Lebanon may also join in, with up to 150,000 fairly accurate rockets, but its Iranian backers will likely hold back. Israel will win this round, of course, but somewhere down the road waits a possible local Armageddon. How did it end up like this? That’s mainly a question for Israel because ever since the 1970s, it has held all the trump cards. There have been no full-scale Arab-Israeli wars for the past half-century because Israel had obviously become unbeatable. It could afford to consider making a sort of negotiated peace with the Arabs, and several prime ministers tried. The fatal obstacle was the millions of Palestinians living in the lands Israel had conquered in 1967. Giving them their own country seemed too dangerous to Israelis who were obsessed by the wars of the past. To other Israelis, who dreamed of expanding into those lands, recognizing any Palestinian legal right to the land was unthinkable. Then-prime minister Yitzhak Rabin signed the Oslo peace accords that envisaged a “two-state solution” in 1993. However, he was murdered by a hard-right Jewish assassin in 1995, and Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu became prime minister. Bibi has been in office for more than half the time since then, and he makes the political weather in Israel. Netanyahu is not the captive of any particular ideology, but he has always understood that his constituency has two elements: those Israelis who still fear the Arabs, and those who lust after the occupied Arab lands and want to drive them out. That combination has made him Israel’s perma-leader and fueled the steady rightward drift of Israeli politics. His situation went critical when he was charged with bribery, fraud, and breach of trust in 2018. The evidence against him is strong, and prison awaited if he could not destroy the independence of the courts. For that, he needed an alliance with the far-right parties, hitherto excluded from power, because only they would share that goal with him. After five elections in four years, Netanyahu has attained that goal, and his extremist partners are helping him subordinate court decisions to government veto. In return, he will let them expand the Jewish settlements in the occupied territories very fast and crush any Arab protests ruthlessly. Gwynne Dyer’s new book is The Shortest History of War. The Hill Times

Israel’s 21st-century version of pogrom

The current sequence of atrocities and counter-atrocities began with a big Israeli raid in the Palestinian city of Nablus last week.

Canada’s aging crisis and a call for reform in eldercare

South Korea to the rescue in Ukraine?

Appeasing Donald Trump with defence dollars

A reluctance for post-pandemic learning

It’s not promises that build the economy—it’s construction

Progress towards partnership: Canada taking strides on African engagement

Israel, Hamas, and the elusive ceasefire

Only Biden can stop the war

Israel-Hamas ceasefire

The frog, the scorpion, and Hamas

Israel: The End of Democracy?

News

Get free news updates

Opinion

Submit a guest opinion article

resources

Advertise

subscribe

get help

Get free news updates

Submit a guest opinion article

Israel’s 21st-century version of pogrom

The current sequence of atrocities and counter-atrocities began with a big Israeli raid in the Palestinian city of Nablus last week.

Get The Foreign Policy Newsletter