Will Western tanks bring victory in Ukraine?

LONDON, U.K.—On Jan. 24 they reset the Doomsday Clock to 90 seconds before midnight. How did they know that Germany would agree to give Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine on Jan. 25? Now we’re all doomed! No time to run! Ninety seconds is barely time to tuck your head between your knees and kiss your ass goodbye. The Doomsday Clock was thought up in 1947 by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists to dramatize the threat of nuclear war. They set it at seven minutes to midnight, and have been moving the minute hand back and forth every year since to tell us how close we were to a nuclear holocaust. It dropped to 17 minutes to midnight after the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Now it’s just a minute and a half—the closest it has ever been—but everything else is being affected by inflation now. Maybe it’s just catching. The Russians are certainly not panicking at the prospect of Leopard tanks with Ukrainian crews showing up to confront them in eastern Ukraine in a month or two (or three). A couple of weeks ago Moscow was hinting that this could be the step that “forced” them to escalate to nuclear war, but that seems to have been just the usual bluff. Now that the Western tanks actually are coming—American M1 Abrams, British Challengers, Leopard 2s from Germany and up to half a dozen other North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members, probably Leclercs from France—the Russians are playing it cool. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that the new tanks “will burn like all the rest.” Some of them will burn, of course: there’s no such thing as an invulnerable tank. But the current rate of exchange, with old Soviet tanks on both sides, is two or three-to-one in favour of Ukraine, mainly because its crews are better trained and more committed. With better tanks than the Russians as well, the Ukrainian advantage will obviously widen. The question is: will it widen enough for Ukraine to take back more Russian-occupied territory, and if so how much? The new tanks are not wonder weapons, and the fact that they will come in four different types is a logistical nightmare: different ammunition, different spare parts, even different fuel in the U.S. case. There will also not be very many of them, at least in this round of donations. A “company” of tanks is 14 or thereabouts, and Germany, the United Kingdom, and Poland will be sending one company each. Smaller countries like Finland and the Czech Republic are unlikely to give more, and the United States is talking of about 30 M1s—two companies. That means the total number of Western tanks being given to Ukraine now is likely to be less than 100, whereas the Ukrainians have consistently said that they need at least 300 to push the Russians back towards their own borders. Over time they may be given more, but time does not work in Ukraine’s favour. The Ukrainians have roughly matched the Russian invaders in the numbers of troops deployed in Ukraine (because they had to), but that amounts to about four per cent of their population compared to only one per cent for the Russians. The Russians can therefore afford to squander the lives of their troops (and often do), whereas the Ukrainians only attack when they are confident that their casualties will be low. Both the recapture of Kharkiv province and the liberation of Kherson were accomplished last autumn with minimal loss of Ukrainian lives, but such opportunities do not abound. The long-planned Ukrainian winter offensive may have been cancelled because a) the ground is still not frozen hard and b) the new tanks will be in the hands of trained Ukrainian crews by the spring. The great Russian winter offensive is underway right now, but getting very little notice because it is making so little progress. Let’s assume for a moment that the Ukrainians will wait till spring, that the new tanks make a difference, and that the Russians lose a lot more ground. Would that justify putting the Doomsday Clock ahead to 90 seconds to midnight? Winning in Ukraine may be an existential matter for Russian dictator Vladimir Putin, who has staked his reputation and perhaps even his life on making a success of the invasion, but it’s not a life-or-death issue for the ambitious men around him. They certainly don’t want to die for him, together with their entire families. So the NATO assessment that a Russian resort to nuclear weapons in Ukraine is most unlikely, which underpins the NATO decision on the tanks, is almost certainly correct. How much of their country the Ukrainians can recapture remains to be seen, but they are at least free to try. Gwynne Dyer’s new book is The Shortest History of War. The Hill Times

Will Western tanks bring victory in Ukraine?

The total number of Western tanks being given to Ukraine now is likely to be less than 100, whereas the Ukrainians have consistently said that they need at least 300 to push the Russians back towards their own borders.

Canada’s aging crisis and a call for reform in eldercare

As COP29 wraps up, will Canada finally stop funding fossils this fall?

Addressing the threat of antimicrobial resistance

The wisdom of Homer Simpson and Aaron Sorkin

Climate finance should target resilient food systems

Trump’s ‘America First’ plans may undermine global trade

Pantomime politics in Eastern Europe

The tide has changed for the Russian war machine

Timing of Biden’s delivery of military aid to Ukraine is carefully calculated

Russia-Ukraine-China and Canadian threads

Tanking support for the Armed Forces

News

Get free news updates

Opinion

Submit a guest opinion article

resources

Advertise

subscribe

get help

Get free news updates

Submit a guest opinion article

Will Western tanks bring victory in Ukraine?

The total number of Western tanks being given to Ukraine now is likely to be less than 100, whereas the Ukrainians have consistently said that they need at least 300 to push the Russians back towards their own borders.

Get The Foreign Policy Newsletter