The Queen is dead. Long live the monarchy?

OTTAWA—The death of Queen Elizabeth at the age of 96 after 70 years as the Commonwealth’s reigning monarch was certainly not an unexpected shock. Nobody can live forever. However much her eventual demise may have been anticipated, the reality of her passing makes one realize just how deeply the Queen was woven into Canadian culture. For most of us, Elizabeth II has been the only monarch we have ever known. Through all of the societal changes and political upheaval over the past seven decades, she served as a singular symbol of continuity. Prime ministers and governors general came and went, but our head of state remained constant. As Elizabeth retained her popularity, Canadians, by and large, took it for granted that the Queen of Canada was in fact a British monarch. It had been that way prior to and beyond Confederation, so the attitude became “well, if it ain’t broke, don’t fit it.” We simply accepted the fact that the Queen’s image adorned our currency and our postage stamps. For the military, royal affiliation runs deep and is a huge part of our national martial tradition. Rightfully so, Canada will mourn the loss of our long-reigning Queen. However, the pain of Elizabeth’s passing will not be felt evenly across Canada’s diverse multi-cultural divide nor across the generational gaps. Over the past 70 years, Canada had steadily emerged from its roots as a British colony. That said, while many will mourn the death of the Queen, there is less than lukewarm willingness to accept King Charles as Canada’s new sovereign. According to an April Angus Reid Institute poll, nearly 67 per cent of Canadians are disapproving of Charles, and 76 per cent would disapprove of Camilla being named the Queen Consort. In a March 2022 poll by Research Company, only 21 per cent of Canadians supported a continued constitutional monarchy, while 49 per cent of survey respondents preferred an elected head of state. According to an April Angus Reid Institute poll, nearly 67 per cent of Canadians are disapproving of Charles, and 76 per cent would disapprove of Camilla being named the Queen Consort. The Hill Times photograph by Sam Garcia During this period of mourning leading up to the royal funeral and Charles’ ascension ceremony, perhaps it is time for Canada to seriously consider what sort of nation we want to be, moving into this post-Elizabeth era. Before our mint starts rolling out coins with King Charles’ image on the reverse, perhaps the Trudeau Liberals could conduct a referendum on whether we should simply stick to the old formula of “the Queen is dead. Long live the King.” Now, before I get a backlash from those accusing me of being some sort of anti-monarchist, I wish to clarify that I had nothing but respect and admiration for Queen Elizabeth. As an impressionable seven-year-old schoolboy living in London, U.K., in 1968, I had the occasion to witness Queen Elizabeth’s Trooping of the Colour in honour of her birthday. This ceremony involved thousands of British Guards in their bearskin hats and scarlet tunics, along with columns of Household Cavalry troopers resplendent in their shining breast-plates. I am fairly certain it was that experience which convinced me to include soldiering among my list of lifelong ambitions. When I did enlist in the Canadian Army in 1982, it was Queen Elizabeth II to whom I took my oath of loyalty. I’m not sure that Canada is ready to become a republic or begin electing a head of state. However, this historic juncture should spark debate about who we want to be as Canadians in the future. The unpopularity of Charles and Camilla should make this an easy point of discussion. For the Canadian military, this might provide the catalyst to retire the unit names and traditions associated with the Royal Family and Canada’s colonial past. This might sound like blasphemy to our historians and monarchists, but it might make things less confusing for average civilians wishing to enlist. One example would be the Princess Louise Fusiliers—a storied reserve infantry regiment in Halifax. The princess is long dead and no Canadian soldier has fired a fusil (a type of musket) in more than 100 years. Canada’s armoured units are all still named after cavalry regiments, yet no Canadian has ridden into battle since 1918. We still call them the Royal Canadian Horse Artillery, despite them becoming mechanized prior to the Second World War. New, numbered units could still carry the battle honours of all these fine regiments, but the new monikers could at least reflect the modern-day role that they currently perform. Rest in peace, Queen Elizabeth II. Long indeed did you reign over us. Scott Taylor is the editor and publisher of Esprit de Corps magazine. The Hill Times

The Queen is dead. Long live the monarchy?

The country may not be ready to become a republic or begin electing a head of state, but this historic juncture should spark debate about who we want to be as Canadians in the future.

Time for a shift: Canada must treat Alzheimer’s like other progressive diseases

Canada faces a cybersecurity crisis with critical infrastructure at risk

Let Ukraine strike back

Who’s standing up to the danger of World War III?

The sad saga of Afghan-Canadian military advisers

Between wars and fears of fascism in the U.S., there’s plenty to be scared about

As Charles III is crowned Canada’s King, Canadians take stock of their relationship with the monarchy

Canada likely to keep calm and carry on with the monarchy

King Charles III’s coronation a chance for Canada to break away from monarchy, says Bloc MP Fortin

There’s something about Harry

The monarch’s sceptre is not a magic wand, writes Kenora reader

News

Get free news updates

Opinion

Submit a guest opinion article

resources

Advertise

subscribe

get help

The Queen is dead. Long live the monarchy?

The country may not be ready to become a republic or begin electing a head of state, but this historic juncture should spark debate about who we want to be as Canadians in the future.

Get The Weekend Point of View Newsletter