Ht-Logo-gigapixel-icon
Search
Close this search box.
Ht-Logo-gigapixel-icon
Search
Close this search box.
Tuesday, November 5, 2024
Canada’s Politics and Government News Source Since 1989
Latest Paper
Tuesday, November 5, 2024 | Latest Paper
Subscribe Now

TRENDING:

Joseph Magnet

Joseph Magnet is professor, faculty of law at the University of Ottawa and legal counsel to the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples.

Daniels v. Canada: what way forward?

  • “The Métis and non-status Indian people, lacking even the protection of the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, are far more exposed to discrimination and
Opinion | BY DWIGHT DOREY, JOSEPH MAGNET | June 20, 2016
The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent (April 14) decision in the Daniels case eroded Canada’s position in its decades-spanning war with the provinces, with the Court declaring that MNSI are in federal jurisdiction, write Dwight Dorey and Joseph Magnet. The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright

Daniels v. Canada: what way forward?

Opinion | BY DWIGHT DOREY, JOSEPH MAGNET | June 20, 2016
  • “The Métis and non-status Indian people, lacking even the protection of the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, are far more exposed to discrimination and

Daniels v. Canada: what way forward?

Opinion | BY DWIGHT DOREY, JOSEPH MAGNET | June 20, 2016
  • “The Métis and non-status Indian people, lacking even the protection of the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, are far more exposed to discrimination and
The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent (April 14) decision in the Daniels case eroded Canada’s position in its decades-spanning war with the provinces, with the Court declaring that MNSI are in federal jurisdiction, write Dwight Dorey and Joseph Magnet. The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright

Daniels v. Canada: what way forward?

  • “The Métis and non-status Indian people, lacking even the protection of the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, are far more exposed to discrimination and
Opinion | BY DWIGHT DOREY, JOSEPH MAGNET | June 20, 2016
The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent (April 14) decision in the Daniels case eroded Canada’s position in its decades-spanning war with the provinces, with the Court declaring that MNSI are in federal jurisdiction, write Dwight Dorey and Joseph Magnet. The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright

Daniels v. Canada: what way forward?

Opinion | BY DWIGHT DOREY, JOSEPH MAGNET | June 20, 2016
  • “The Métis and non-status Indian people, lacking even the protection of the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, are far more exposed to discrimination and

Daniels v. Canada: what way forward?

Opinion | BY DWIGHT DOREY, JOSEPH MAGNET | June 20, 2016
  • “The Métis and non-status Indian people, lacking even the protection of the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, are far more exposed to discrimination and
The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent (April 14) decision in the Daniels case eroded Canada’s position in its decades-spanning war with the provinces, with the Court declaring that MNSI are in federal jurisdiction, write Dwight Dorey and Joseph Magnet. The Hill Times photograph by Jake Wright
More Stories

News

Get free news updates

Opinion

Submit a guest opinion article

resources

Advertise

get help

Subscribe
CloseMenu