Canada needs a scientific advisory board to Parliament to help formulate science policy

We need to develop a political culture that is proactive, not reactive—one that understands the value of sound science policy.

By ROBERT MANN

Published November 16, 2009

View story

Comments

To the Editor

Arthur Milnes

Prime Ministers' Hill portrait gallery all began with John A. Macdonald

Ken Rubin

Different ways of gaining access to Parliament Hill

David T. Jones

Winter and security: an analogy

The Q & A

Kate Malloy

Canada's 'most idiosyncratic observer' has loads to say about climate change politics

Oped

Pierre Sadik

Why the U.S. is not interested in carbon cap and trade with Canada

Backrooms

Angelo Persichilli

Guergis should be dropped in next Cabinet shuffle

Political Reporting

Tom Korski

If I were finance minister, I'd impose a luxury tax on air conditioners

Andrew Cardozo

Growing concern skills shortage returning to Canadian economy

Inside Politics

Chantal Hébert

Harper's running on a public opinion treadmill

James Travers

PM more concerned with reinforcing party's core constituency than converting moderate majority

Heard on the Hill

Bea Vongdouangchanh

Iggy goes to Archives, Manning goes behind the spin, and Copps to be honoured

Book Reviews

Abbas Rana

BEST BOOKS 2009: Authors on their books, and why federal politicians should read them

In the House

Joe Jordan

Parliamentary machine headed in wrong direction: It's time to fix it!

Nelson Wiseman

The use, misuse, and abuse of prorogation

Civil Circles

Cynthia Münster

PS should follow feds' lead on stimulus spending, cut bureaucratic red tape

Party Central

Harris MacLeod

A ray of sunshine amidst the back-to-Parliament gloom: a Hill tea party

Greg Elmer

Virtual organizing: we may not know what it means yet, but can see political effects

Copps' Corner

Sheila Copps

Queers, commies and dames featured prominently in Harper's return of Parliament